4 ms·
My reading of the article is that actual storage of the carbon is not part of this work either.
by tom_mellior 6y ago
My reading of the article is that actual storage of the carbon is not part of this work either.
- sudhirj 6y agoWe should used the captured carbon to make the fabled nanotubes that we're all going to be using, wearing and living in.
- canofbars 6y agoWouldn't this captured carbon be a burnable fuel? Surely if you put it back underground a mining company would just dig it up and burn it again.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- mhandley 6y agoNo, this captures carbon dioxide. Turning carbon dioxide back into carbon is not part of the process. You still need a way to store the CO2 permanently.