3 ms·
One of these is clearly not like the other, in multiple ways. You're at the very least misrepresenting why these people are being banned. Tax policy is not any
by patagurbon 6y ago
One of these is clearly not like the other, in multiple ways. You're at the very least misrepresenting why these people are being banned.
Tax policy is not anywhere close the tweets at issue which often amount to terroristic threatening. If you started verbally abusing other customers in a grocery store, perhaps even implying you'll murder them, then yes, you'll be banned.
To the rest of your comment, are you seriously comparing tweets to food? You have a fundamental right to food, not to have your opinions transmitted by others.
- stale2002 6y ago> You have a fundamental right to food, not to have your opinions transmitted by others At least in the US, it is the opposite. There isn't a constitutional amendment protecting your rights regarding food. But there is a constitutional right related to your rights regarding speech. Many people think that these rights regarding speech are pretty darn important. Possibly even the most important rights that a person can have. So I would absolutely say that they are comparable, and that people's right regarding transmitting speech are possibly even more important than any other rights out there.
- michaelmrose 6y agoYou can have a right to speech but not have a right for a private party to carry your speech this isn't contradictory.