3 ms·
AZERTY (French) here with numbers accessed through shift and brackets through AltGR. This is a horrendous layout. Bonus points for it being slightly different
by vladvasiliu 6y ago
AZERTY (French) here with numbers accessed through shift and brackets through AltGR.
This is a horrendous layout. Bonus points for it being slightly different on Mac and PC.
I have absolutely no idea how people can use this layout for programming without going crazy. I don't program full time, I mostly do sysadmin work, and even if I don't think that typing speed is a limiting factor for how much code I can write, I do find it extremely annoying to type certain characters which are used quite often.
Regarding language I type equally English and French so I absolutely love the Mac OS international layout: QWERTY so everything is where you expect it but with ALT I can get pretty much every French character I want, easily. This could probably work for German, too: ALT U + U = Ü. ALT + S = ß. I'm not sure about other nordic languages, though.
I love this so much that I configured my linux and windows pcs to use the same layout. Some characters take somewhat longer to type (three different key strokes for ù instead of one) but I guess that for someone not writing exclusively french prose the tradeoff is completely worth it.
- elric 6y agoI use AZERTY for programming. It's easy. ,();: can be accessed without any modifiers. []{} require a modifier. If you're typing numbers frequently and don't have a numpad, then it seems like that would be a worth while investment. I find the physical shape of the keyboard to be a much more important factor than the layout. Tilted splits are where it's at for me.