3 ms·
Yes, but then we did not invent much else in this area since then. Computing is fundamentally the same today as it was in the 60's. Sure, transistors are smalle
by m0zg 6y ago
Yes, but then we did not invent much else in this area since then. Computing is fundamentally the same today as it was in the 60's. Sure, transistors are smaller, there's more memory, and clock is in gigaherts, but it's the same paradigm. And this paradigm is not going to take us to AGI even if Moore's law weren't dead for the last decade. Which it is.
- jinpan 6y agoHave you heard of this thing called quantum computing?
- shahbaby 6y agoWill never replace general computers. It's more of a hardware to run specific types of algorithms.
- m0zg 6y agoThe thing that nobody can tell if it works or not? What about it?
- catalogia 6y agoAre quantum computers even relevant to AGI? I'm under the impression that the belief that human brains are quantum computers is considered fringe in both computer science and particularly neuroscience, despite having a handful of high profile proponents (notably Penrose.)