4 ms·
It will never be cheaper than avoiding co2 in the first place (or at least catching at the source) so while it might have applications, it seems impractical fo
by dukoid 6y ago
It will never be cheaper than avoiding co2 in the first place (or at least catching at the source) so while it might have applications, it seems impractical for making significant progress towards saving the planet at this point.
- posix_me_less 6y agoWhat do you mean by "saving the planet"? Do you mean keeping the population numbers and saving the western way of life at the same time? What would make significant progress towards that goal?