You're arguing that the US government should be able to force companies to publish content that it doesnt want on it's site. > Ah yeah, the elections. I'm not

You're arguing that the US government should be able to force companies to publish content that it doesnt want on it's site. > Ah yeah, the elections. I'm not american, so i have no horse in the elections, apart from wanting twitter to continue to exist. Twitter is a private company, it should be able to moderate its platform as it sees fit. If it see's content that it feels is dangerous, they should be completely within their right to remove it from their site. Preventing them from being able to do that is the government restricting twitters speech. If you don't like how twitter moderates it's platform, you should have alternatives to go to that moderate differently. That's basically the whole premise of subreddits and, well, a "free and open market", rather than the government forcing companies to publish content it doesnt want on it's site.