4 ms·

I have used Windows 98 SE on CPUs up to various Pentium 3s. There was a problem with big (above 512MB) RAM volumes but it was easy to solve. I was only forced

I have used Windows 98 SE on CPUs up to various Pentium 3s. There was a problem with big (above 512MB) RAM volumes but it was easy to solve. I was only forced to switch to Windows XP when I upgraded to Pentium M (Dothan) - besides the Safe Mode I could find no solution to run Windowes 98 on it. I would gladly return to Windows 98 now if my hardware and software supported it.

Wowfunhappy 6y ago
Why do you prefer Windows 98 over XP?
- qwerty456127 6y ago
  It was much more a clean-and-simple design. The less complexity and useless (to me) features an OS has - the more I like it. Of course I mean the way it works, not the way it looks. It also took so little RAM and HDD it would altogether fit in a humble corner of my today RAM - I don't really get it why does modern software need so much more.
  - eropple 6y ago
    "Clean-and-simple design." OK. So you like an OS with no meaningful memory segmentation (you could hop into kernel mode by modifying a register), awful multiprocessing support, and absolutely no defense in depth against the truckloads of malware that are all over the Internet? That's certainly a take.
    - saagarjha 6y ago
      I mean, that also enables a lot of interesting things…
      - eropple 6y ago
        So does a gallon of nitroglycerin. Also similarly, it shouldn't be mishandled and normal people shouldn't be trusted with it.
    - qwerty456127 6y ago
      It was totally enough for a personal computer. Certainly not enough for a server. I only ran trusted software and could do whatever I wanted. As for the Internet - it's a browser's job to sandbox the JavaScript.
      - eropple 6y ago
        So no defense in depth and an uncritical reliance on browsers to be perfect?
  - farmerbb 6y ago
    My views on 98 vs XP are the opposite. I ran 98 for a while on my HP Vectra VL with a ~233MHz Pentium II and, if I remember correctly, 256MB of RAM. It was dog slow, took at least 10 seconds just to open an Explorer window. Decided to try XP on it, and I was blown away at just how much better it performed. Explorer windows opened up instantly and the whole system just ran smoother.
    - Wowfunhappy 6y ago
      Not to discount this, but I do wonder how much might have been the "clean Windows install" effect. What would have happened if you did a clean install of 98?
jve 6y ago
> I would gladly return to Windows 98 now if my hardware and software supported it. Not if you would like to browse web. HTTPS - sorry. But maybe you should give ReactOS a shot with the classic theme: https://reactos.org/ https://reactos.org/ (WinNT era I think)

Wowfunhappy 6y ago

Why do you prefer Windows 98 over XP?

qwerty456127 6y ago
It was much more a clean-and-simple design. The less complexity and useless (to me) features an OS has - the more I like it. Of course I mean the way it works, not the way it looks. It also took so little RAM and HDD it would altogether fit in a humble corner of my today RAM - I don't really get it why does modern software need so much more.
- eropple 6y ago
  "Clean-and-simple design." OK. So you like an OS with no meaningful memory segmentation (you could hop into kernel mode by modifying a register), awful multiprocessing support, and absolutely no defense in depth against the truckloads of malware that are all over the Internet? That's certainly a take.
  - saagarjha 6y ago
    I mean, that also enables a lot of interesting things…
    - eropple 6y ago
      So does a gallon of nitroglycerin. Also similarly, it shouldn't be mishandled and normal people shouldn't be trusted with it.
  - qwerty456127 6y ago
    It was totally enough for a personal computer. Certainly not enough for a server. I only ran trusted software and could do whatever I wanted. As for the Internet - it's a browser's job to sandbox the JavaScript.
    - eropple 6y ago
      So no defense in depth and an uncritical reliance on browsers to be perfect?
- farmerbb 6y ago
  My views on 98 vs XP are the opposite. I ran 98 for a while on my HP Vectra VL with a ~233MHz Pentium II and, if I remember correctly, 256MB of RAM. It was dog slow, took at least 10 seconds just to open an Explorer window. Decided to try XP on it, and I was blown away at just how much better it performed. Explorer windows opened up instantly and the whole system just ran smoother.
  - Wowfunhappy 6y ago
    Not to discount this, but I do wonder how much might have been the "clean Windows install" effect. What would have happened if you did a clean install of 98?

jve 6y ago

> I would gladly return to Windows 98 now if my hardware and software supported it. Not if you would like to browse web. HTTPS - sorry. But maybe you should give ReactOS a shot with the classic theme: https://reactos.org/ https://reactos.org/ (WinNT era I think)