> I'm suprised it wasn't something native like QT. The question is what you really would gain from using QT compared to Chrome/HTML/JS. Performance won't real

> I'm suprised it wasn't something native like QT. The question is what you really would gain from using QT compared to Chrome/HTML/JS. Performance won't really matter for this. It it's good enough on the hardware they have, then further improving it does not make a difference. Provided they are running everything really mission-critical and real-time outside of the UI and on an RTOS or specialized hardware anyway (I really really hope so). One advantage might be audibility and the hope for less defects due to a smaller codebase and less dependencies. But I think even QT is already far beyond that point. And since Chrome is nowadays wider deployed, it might have a higher level of maturity than eg. the QT/QML tech.