3 ms·
I just meant more - 1<>1 channels. So I could say : sqwark Dave and it instantly creates me a 1<>1 channel with Dave of he’s available. Also just noticed the s
by simon_000666 6y ago
I just meant more - 1<>1 channels. So I could say : sqwark Dave and it instantly creates me a 1<>1 channel with Dave of he’s available.
Also just noticed the second download link lower down the page doesn’t work.
- zumachase 6y agoAh yeah that's on our todo list. At the moment, we tend to create groups like "Person A / Person B" but it's not ideal. The plan is that you can also Squawk anyone inside a group 1-on-1. Screen-sharing is next on the list. Download link fixed...thanks!
- simon_000666 6y agoCool, yep that also works. Another awesome thing would be the option to run a speech to text algo on the conversation and have it transcribed into the channel log so if I miss the conversation I can catch up on things. But also you would need an ‘off-the-record’ Mode if you wanted to complain in private.
- simon_000666 6y agoAnother thought, is maybe you could also make this a slack plugin. Would reduce the onboarding friction.