3 ms·

> making you an extraneous cost which anyone in their right mind would want to remove Wanting to remove people for being "extraneous costs" is not right-minded

• kebman 6y ago
  You are completely correct, Sir. This is why we must avoid organizing our states in ways that create such dependencies at all cost, and instead strive to create states that create voluntary sharing of resources and values that are mutually beneficial. That is the only way progress can be made, and freedom can be insured. On the other hand, if you were a baker, and someone told you that you must give your bread away for free to a third party, how would you feel about that? The only thing you would get in return, is not being punished by the one forcing you to work, and not killed by the masses for whom you provide your free bread. I don't know about you, but personally I'd hate to live under such a fascist regime.
• tathougies 6y ago
  Unless you consider the majority of human societies to have every existed extreme sociopathy. While I don't particularly support it, many societies throughout history exposed children with disabilities and many many more would execute or exile elements they deemed 'criminal'. Today, we still remove people for potentially being extraneous costs in abortion. It's legal, but it is the same motivation. I mean, I personally think it's all sociopathic, but it's the normal state of 'the state'.