4 ms·
Stop SAYING this! Goodness HN has stopped caring about facts. This ruling was not upheld. Please stop using this example, HN.
by ta17711771 6y ago
Stop SAYING this! Goodness HN has stopped caring about facts.
This ruling was not upheld. Please stop using this example, HN.
- smitty1e 6y agoWhat specific case, then? I come here to learn. Please educate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_scrutiny https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_scrutiny
- ben509 6y agoSchenk v US was partially overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio. We've come around, though, as Holmes' line of reasoning is very common today. Some details in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shouting_fire_in_a_crowded_theater https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shouting_fire_in_a_crowded_the...
- bhupy 6y agoTo add some more commentary: https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/11/its-time-to-stop-using-the-fire-in-a-crowded-theater-quote/264449/ https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/11/its-tim... Shouting "fire" in a crowded theater is protected by the 1A as long as it passes the Brandenburg Test of "imminent lawless action".
- bhupy 6y agoIt's not accurate, it was an argument used in a SCOTUS case that has since been unanimously overturned. https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/11/its-time-to-stop-using-the-fire-in-a-crowded-theater-quote/264449/ https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/11/its-tim... Brandenburg v Ohio established the current standard for free speech, and it's extremely permissive.