3 ms·
Linking directly to the article here: https://www.medicineuncensored.com/a-study-out-of-thin-air https://www.medicineuncensored.com/a-study-out-of-thin-air It
by joncrane 6y ago
Linking directly to the article here: https://www.medicineuncensored.com/a-study-out-of-thin-air https://www.medicineuncensored.com/a-study-out-of-thin-air
It reads like a Muddy Waters (famous stock shorter) screed. Good stuff. Fair to say the data is made up. The question is, who would be incentivized to do such a thing? Things that make you go hmmm....
- seesawtron 6y agoWhen such a large study is published in a big Journal, claiming that a drug might have a negative impact on lives of people in the trials, the authorities will be considered stupid not to pay attention to it at all and continue the trials. That is exactly what they did: They paused their trials temporarily to look at the evidence of this study, examined it and found that it was indeed controversial and lacked solid data. Now they have resumed the trials again. The media sells it as a clickbait story "All trials STOPPED because of a flawed study" implying they were stopped PERMANENTLY to excite the general audience. For them it is entirely something that brings them huge revenue from ads when they write such "emotinally driven" stories, they do not care about the effects it has on the public in the long term by reducing faith in world health organizations.