3 ms·
If there's literally hundreds of videos out there (which is probably an exaggeration for the time period given, but regardless there are plenty), there's no nee
by Anon1096 6y ago
If there's literally hundreds of videos out there (which is probably an exaggeration for the time period given, but regardless there are plenty), there's no need to publish lies or Twitter hearsay. Sticking to publishing solid evidence makes criticisms like the GP's totally irrelevant. I'm on the side of the protests, but really to change minds you need to be concise and accurate in reporting. Quality > Quantity if quantity means you're not filtering garbage.
- ebg13 6y ago> I'm on the side of the protests, but I smell a concern troll. > but really to change minds you need to be concise and accurate in reporting Ok. Show us the links you think are the right ones.
- mistermann 6y agoEvidence that supports your side gets a free pass? Being skeptical of claims from any side seems like what we should be striving for. There's no need to treat every story as True/False binary - considering the quality of the data we're working with, the most proper status for most claims should probably be [unknown].