3 ms·
> absolute total autonomy and ownership of their conversations, because the only place their conversations exist is on the devices they own. This also means a
by Andrew_nenakhov 6y ago
> absolute total autonomy and ownership of their conversations, because the only place their conversations exist is on the devices they own.
This also means a total loss of data if something happens to the device.
Of course, I can imagine some usecases where this would be a plus, but I suspect that most of them are on the wrong side of the law. Now, coming from Russia, I know that it doesn't automatically mean it is something bad, but still, in vast majority of cases, it does.
Not my cup of tea, thanks, because keeping my data is very important for me. For this, good old federated model with client-server architecture strikes the best balance between reliability and privacy. Just use your own domain name, and all will be fine
- Arathorn 6y agoIt doesn't necessarily mean total loss of data, because it would replicate onto your other devices - and you could also run a server too as an always-on p2p node. The idea is to have a hybrid, so casual users can start off p2p but then pin their accounts to a server when they see the value.
- LibertyBeta 6y agoThis would be similar to people who run Syncthing meshes for their file system backups, correct?
- Arathorn 6y agoyup, precisely