Ultimately, it is Mark Zuckerberg's website and therefore the content reflects the views of Mark Zuckerberg. He has the final say on whether something is publi

Ultimately, it is Mark Zuckerberg's website and therefore the content reflects the views of Mark Zuckerberg. He has the final say on whether something is published on the website or not. It really should not matter how many "members" or "guest contributors" he has, even if it is in the billions. User-generated content is just a way to get traffic. What if the controversial speaker had his own website where he published his comments? Would Cloudflare keep it online? Instead of an overgrown website eclipsing the web, the issue then shifts to one or a few companies dominating access to hosting. Common words used in idealistic HN comments are "decentralisation" and "democracy". Neither concept suppports the idea of "minority rule" which is what we have in the case of the FAANG and a few other companies.