3 ms·
This enforces a "developers-must-own-and-continue-to-own-a-domain". Not saying that's bad, but it needs to be considered. for eg A lot of software these days is
by captn3m0 6y ago
This enforces a "developers-must-own-and-continue-to-own-a-domain". Not saying that's bad, but it needs to be considered. for eg A lot of software these days is built and served entirely from GitHub.
You could even end up re-using domain-name-signals from existing spam datasets (whois, hosting provider, age etc).
- Wowfunhappy 6y ago> This enforces a "developers-must-own-and-continue-to-own-a-domain". Not saying that's bad I'll come out and say it's bad... but also much better than the current situation. So as a compromise I'm all for it!
- mopsi 6y ago> A lot of software these days is built and served entirely from GitHub. The identity could also be tied to Github accounts, among other options.
- donmcronald 6y agoA domain is $10-$20 / year. I’ll take that over $500 / year EV code signing certificates.