2 ms·
Not what I'm asking. I'm trying to discuss the correct use of force, not if the force is being used correctly. I can often admit that what I wrote can be misu
by eitland 6y ago
Not what I'm asking.
I'm trying to discuss the correct use of force, not if the force is being used correctly.
I can often admit that what I wrote can be misunderstood but you and mdorazio seems to ho out of your way to misunderstand me.
Why?
- QuercusMax 6y agoThe thing is, the cops STARTED this situation. They should have their weapons and equipment taken away, like in most civilized countries.
- pjc50 6y ago> I'm trying to discuss the correct use of force, not if the force is being used correctly. This sounds like a distinction without a difference?
- eitland 6y agoAbsolutely not: one is the question: if there exist a situation where the use of force is good, is teargas/cs gas a good way to apply that force instead of water cannons/ shields and sticks/etc? This is the question I tried to ask before getting downvoted heavily. The other question is if it is correct to use force. (Or based on the amount of downvotes and weird answers I have got it seems more like some people think I support police brutality while other think I use the "think of the children"-argument.)