> The "revolving door" is funny to see how ridiculous it can get, but really who of the citizenry would be better prepared to steward these organizations? What

> The "revolving door" is funny to see how ridiculous it can get, but really who of the citizenry would be better prepared to steward these organizations? What exactly would the pedigree of that person look like? Let's invert your argument on it's head: - No one of the citizenry exists to play this role. Why? - There is nothing stopping anyone who has regulated the system from switching sides to the thing they used to regulate - Therefore, anyone qualified enough will pass through the revolving door and systematically brain-drain the regulatory apparatus rendering it impotent - Therefore, this part of capitalism is able to seamlessly absorb and neutralize any resistance or regulation - Therefore, there is nothing stopping it from absorbing all power and instituting a one party state Don't call pointing out the corruptibility of this system "faux controversy."