The point is that an order to siege an American city would not be unlawful, under the Insurrection Act, because there are parts of the Act that give a lot of di

The point is that an order to siege an American city would not be unlawful, under the Insurrection Act, because there are parts of the Act that give a lot of discretion to the President about when to use force. That siege order could be legal. At that point, disobeying has to be a moral act, and the law isn’t a concern anymore. I say this living in an apartment about three blocks from a tank in Los Angeles.