4 ms·
The civil rights movement had a substantial amount of violence and change only started to happen because there was a very serious threat of it escalating. Pure
by sdkjfhskjfh 6y ago
The civil rights movement had a substantial amount of violence and change only started to happen because there was a very serious threat of it escalating. Purely peaceful protesting has almost never worked and most of the examples people cite (India's independence, anti-apartheid etc.) include a large amount of historical revisionism.
- throwaway2048 6y agoYep, both india and south africa had a huge looming background of potential (and actual) violence. Nelson Mandela was literally a marxist terrorist, yet is often held up as some kind of ideal of non violent protest.