3 ms·
7 minutes ago you submitted this story as https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/twitter-takes-down-washington-protest-disinformation-bot-behavior-n1221456 http
by giardini 6y ago
7 minutes ago you submitted this story as
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/twitter-takes-down-washington-protest-disinformation-bot-behavior-n1221456 https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/twitter-takes-down-was...
- aspenmayer 6y agoIt’s a different link? I’m not sure what it is you are saying. They are not duplicate articles as they are different urls, different sections (this is a technology post from CNBC), and different editorial teams. I’m open to discussing this link with you further.
- dang 6y agoBut the text is identical. This is the exact same article being syndicated on two sites, and therefore an obvious dupe. More importantly: even if you have two different articles on the same topic, please don't make separate submissions. Submit what you consider the best one, and post a link to the second one in the comments.
- aspenmayer 6y agoI appreciate that clarity; however, until karma sharing is implemented, should I just refrain from posting? Otherwise, the link I didn’t post is the one that I’d get scooped on. Happens a lot. And since they are different urls, the duplicate post detector is even less likely to work correctly. What is the proper expected site behavior in this case? Expected user behavior? I just want to meet or exceed community standards. On a different point, I don’t know how it is possible to say which article is best at any given time on this topic as they all include additional information not present in other articles. I don’t mind if you remove one of these two posts with same content; I don’t mean to make a duplicate post.