3 ms·
> Riots for the most part affect people who had nothing material to do with whatever the complaint is This is an interesting point that should be addressed. I’
by runarberg 6y ago
> Riots for the most part affect people who had nothing material to do with whatever the complaint is
This is an interesting point that should be addressed. I’m not sure I’m the most qualified, but I’ll try.
Imagine you are trying to claim insurance on something but the insurance company has denied you. You believe you have rights to your claim but the only option they gave you is to call a phone number where an anonymous operator answers. They can only tell you the facts of the matter, and not transfer you up to a person with authority to revise the claim. What do you do? Do you get angry and direct your anger towards the operator, or do you calmly hang up, swear to your self for a day or two, and then forget about it? The first option is a normal human response, that most of us will do.
Now bump up the stakes by a million, and imagine you are a part of a minority that has received systematic injustice for decades. You are told you have the option to try to affect the system from within, elect the right officials, get legislation through, etc. But at this point you believe it has been tried for too long and it doesn’t work. Now something happens that makes you angry and really your only option at this point (outside of taking things silently and accepting how things are) is to direct your anger straight at the system, but the only face of the system that is doing all this injustice are storefronts and institutions in your downtown area. The natural (and the only real choice) is to smash it.
See looting is not just understandable action towards this injustice, it is also the natural response. And at this point, the only response.
- mc32 6y agoLike I said above. It sounds like one trying to justify a person aggrieved by a boss and HR does nothing, boss doubles down, gets demoted -maybe it’s been relentless and one day they snap and they figure the whole office is going to pay. Sure he was caged in, no one heard him, he got ridiculed. As a society we don’t condone those outbursts no matter the self justification.
- runarberg 6y agoI’m not sure what you are getting at here. Has the employee been severely bullied this whole time? Has the boss physically attacked the employee? Is all the office aware that this is going on (and some even take the employee’s side)? And is the response to throw down computers and roll over desks? If the answer to all of those questions are “yes”, then—as a society—we absolutely condone this outburst, and might even help the employee get legal justification in the process.