3 ms·
Are you saying that Assange would just volunteer this information to the FBI? Even if they offered some sort of deal involving immunity from US prosecution, it
by dane-pgp 6y ago
Are you saying that Assange would just volunteer this information to the FBI? Even if they offered some sort of deal involving immunity from US prosecution, it's unlikely that Assange would have had any proof that the source of the emails was the Russian government. (Also, incriminating the Russian government in a crime can have negative effects on your life expectancy).
As for your statistics, it's worth noting that Mueller's investigation probably made a profit by uncovering millions of dollars worth of tax fraud[0], and it lead to indictments of or guilty pleas from 34 people and 3 companies.[1] That doesn't seem like it was a complete waste of time or money.
[0] https://www.inquisitr.com/5213408/robert-mueller-investigation-profit-tax-fraud-cost/ https://www.inquisitr.com/5213408/robert-mueller-investigati...
[1] https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/2/20/17031772/mueller-indictments-grand-jury https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/2/20/17031772/m...
- ed25519FUUU 6y ago> Are you saying that Assange would just volunteer this information to the FBI? I'm just wondering why they never bothered to ask? I mean, he committed the crime, why not interview him?
- fit2rule 6y agoWhat crime did he commit?
- ed25519FUUU 6y agoI was speaking figuratively, since they were an investigation and Assange is the one who ran wikileaks when they released the DNC/Podesta emails.
- fit2rule 6y agoNo laws were broken by publishing the DNC/Podesta emails. It is not illegal to embarrass politicians by exposing their corruption. The fact of him being investigated, also, is not evidence of guilt. So speaking figuratively is actually counter-productive to understanding the situation with regards to Wikileaks exposure of US government crimes against humanity.