3 ms·
Switching to one-way-binding is really just replacing upward propagation with events, right? Aren't both approaches vulnerable to data-change cycles, just by di
by MaxBarraclough 6y ago
Switching to one-way-binding is really just replacing upward propagation with events, right? Aren't both approaches vulnerable to data-change cycles, just by different means?
- TuringTest 6y agoMaybe the difference is that you keep control with events, i.e. you can filter, retarget, cancel or otherwise reason in general about the way they propagate? I'm no expert, but the essence of the "reactive functional programming" programming paradigm is that you have composable high level abstractions about the streams of events (e.g. marble diagrams).[1] [1] https://blog.danlew.net/2017/07/27/an-introduction-to-functional-reactive-programming/ https://blog.danlew.net/2017/07/27/an-introduction-to-functi...