4 ms·
Most of that doesn't belong on the alternative web I have in mind. It can keep living on the current one. Usability features like dyslexia friendly fonts, lar
by downerending 6y ago
Most of that doesn't belong on the alternative web I have in mind. It can keep living on the current one.
Usability features like dyslexia friendly fonts, large fonts, etc., belong in the browser, not on a web page. If anything, this would be easier on the alternative web.
The key idea would be that when you go to a URL on this alternative web, you know you're not going to get slammed with some cycle-sucking, RAM-sucking, virus-carrying, UI horror. More gopher-ish, but relatable to those who have used a web browser.
I can dream.
edit: Ha. Right now, this comment has 6 points, and my original above has -2 points. My illusions of HN rationality are thus reduced. sniff