4 ms·
Turns out the 50+ years we'd need for fusion is a bit too long a position for a system that demands quarterly growth for growing retirement accounts, whodathunk
by fivre 6y ago
Turns out the 50+ years we'd need for fusion is a bit too long a position for a system that demands quarterly growth for growing retirement accounts, whodathunk. They take 50 years to mature anyway, what's the point?
Granted, you probably want a bit less than <the time you expect to cash out the account> to figure out if your bets were correct or not and you actually have a retirement account, so it sorta makes sense, but we've gone off the deep end in the other direction, so it doesn't.
- Apocryphon 6y agoEternal never fusion is basically a public policy failure writ large: https://i.imgur.com/D6cDJ22.png https://i.imgur.com/D6cDJ22.png