3 ms·
Yep more or less. I was working with Adam, Surplus' author, for a bit before he didn't have time to work on the project further. I've take a different tact now
by ryansolid 6y ago
Yep more or less. I was working with Adam, Surplus' author, for a bit before he didn't have time to work on the project further. I've take a different tact now with the reactive system and improved the rendering technique a bit. But he definitely deserves the credit for pioneering the JSX approach 4 years ago now. My initial JSX work was generalizing it for other reactive libraries and then it just grew to this.
- aabbcc1241 6y agoI see Solid uses proxy to 'get' and 'notice update' the state. This seems providing a better DX than s-js. However, Solid require developer to explicitly use 'react style/hook' to update the state. Why not also use proxy to 'set' and 'notice update' on the state?
- ryansolid 6y agoI'm big on read/write segregation and explicit mutation. With simple signals you have this naturally. Once you move to a nested tree you can lose this. Keeping this control allows us to adopt immutability patterns and enforce unidirectional flow. To me this is the most sane way to deal complex reactivity.
- aabbcc1241 6y agoI agree, then the way to read and update state with dependency tracing in solid seems meeting the sweet spot of the s-js and elm/react style.