In situations of institutional inequality, the bottom row considers everything above it complicit. https://i.imgur.com/vpv5anc.jpg https://i.imgur.com/vpv5anc.

In situations of institutional inequality, the bottom row considers everything above it complicit. https://i.imgur.com/vpv5anc.jpg https://i.imgur.com/vpv5anc.jpg It's a have vs have not, opportunity vs not. A business owner is a have. It's a form of leveling a playing field by destroying what others have. Similar to the intention of the terrorists in Fight Club or Goldeneye, a reset to blow up banks and financial institutions. I don't think the rioting mob necessary has thought it out that well, but the anger causing it, and targeting business moreso than residential is an attack on the benefactors of protection rackets, whether they be law enforcement, banks, anyone who gives some a different opportunity than others. In this case business and land owners. It's a belief that "fixing the system from the inside" has failed. Attack's on the media are similar, because they are intrinsically linked. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politico-media_complex https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politico-media_complex The message of Fight Club was NOT to blow everything up, and that it can be fixed from the inside, but not everyone agrees.