4 ms·
This wasn't doxing. It revealed her arrest details, but IRRC in New York City, is public information.
by jordanisalive 6y ago
This wasn't doxing. It revealed her arrest details, but IRRC in New York City, is public information.
- olliej 6y agolet's see what they did: * They arrested a number of people exercising their constitutional right to protest. In this case police abuse. * Stated they were going to war with the mayor - after all he's is not 100% in support of them having no consequences for their illegal actions. * Then deliberately published as widely as possible the details of his daughter specifically Given their ability to completely control every aspect of this, it's clearly intended to achieve the same result of doxxing: if you don't do what we say, we will deliberately put your family's life in potential danger. NYPD union is a gang. Every officer who supports this action, or any of the brutality and constitutional abuses by the NYPD is complicit, and are criminals who should be in jail.
- sterlind 6y agoAgreed. They could have gotten their point across while still redacting her personal information. Publishing that information is what makes it cross the line to doxxing.
- olliej 6y agoBut what is their point? No, the only reason they published this is to intimidate the people who are elected and who are meant to keep them in check.
- symmitchry 6y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxing The act of sharing it and aggregating it is the issue. The information doesn't need to be private.
- thoraway1010 6y agoActually for practical purposes it is generally private for a few weeks until summons info makes it to webcriminal.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]