4 ms·
Taking the dude's work that he licensed them to take (via Apache 2.0) is one thing. Giving him false hope about a future job prospect is another.
by ru552 6y ago
Taking the dude's work that he licensed them to take (via Apache 2.0) is one thing. Giving him false hope about a future job prospect is another.
- stormdennis 6y agoYes that was really low scam artist type behaviour. Still, on the bright side, the more profitable MS are, the more money for Bill and Melinda's good causes
- tarsinge 6y agoYeah if someone scam you $10 but give $0.001 to charity I guess it's a brighter side than if they kept everything.
- rectang 6y agoBut he didn't license them to take code without attribution. If they had forked the codebase, maintained the copyright notices and adhered to the conditions of the Apache License 2.0, that would have constituted "credit". The Apache License 2.0 requires attribtion!