3 ms·
The problem I see is that "violent" speech is a subjective perception. I could claim that your post was "violent", and that I was harmed by it. Sticks and sto
by Fjolsvith 6y ago
The problem I see is that "violent" speech is a subjective perception. I could claim that your post was "violent", and that I was harmed by it.
Sticks and stones.
- paulgb 6y agoYes, there is subjectivity. In this particular case, Trump and Zuckerberg talked on the phone and Zuckerberg expressed concerns about the content but ultimately decided to keep it up. If you really want fair and impartial content policies that apply equally to everyone, shouldn't it be concerning that we can't all call Zuckerberg on the phone? https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/31/media/trump-zuckerberg-phone-call/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/31/media/trump-zuckerberg-phone-...
- tobylane 6y agoSection 230 permits the platform to decide for themselves what is violent, according to https://www.theregreview.org/2019/07/15/kosseff-correcting-persistent-myth-about-law-that-created-the-internet/ https://www.theregreview.org/2019/07/15/kosseff-correcting-p...