3 ms·
My comment was not meant as criticism, I just thought it was nicely ironic. But I guess you're actually consistent: you often lament about people ignoring or r
by cbolton 6y ago
My comment was not meant as criticism, I just thought it was nicely ironic.
But I guess you're actually consistent: you often lament about people ignoring or reinventing approaches that proved themselves in older languages. Here are people that actually take clues from one such language, and you lament that they didn't do it earlier. I see now that it's not really ironic. Rather, you're seeing the glass half empty while I was seeing it half full.
- pjmlp 6y agoI would be happy if this was their first attempt, sadly I have lost count how many times the team has published such studies with zero outcomes. While I am sure Java will get value types, it already has had several experimental releases and the features have been incrementally integrated, after the switch to 6 months release cadence, I am not so sure in regards to Go. All we get is a source code repository full of comments showing how much is left to be done, if ever. Untouched since last August. https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/187317 https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/187317