3 ms·
I'm sorry for posting it then. I read through the article they had some official quoting. So I thought it's worth for a discussion. Otherwise I wouldn't have. A
by amrrs 6y ago
I'm sorry for posting it then. I read through the article they had some official quoting. So I thought it's worth for a discussion. Otherwise I wouldn't have. Apologies again!
- dang 6y agoOh thanks—I certainly didn't mean to pick on you personally! or even, in a way, this specific site, since they are subject to systemic pressures to do this kind of thing. However, this case is noticeably more deceptive than usual.