3 ms·
Eh wha? No-one has tried to do an alternative glibc? Wrong: http://www.fefe.de/dietlibc/ http://www.fefe.de/dietlibc/ http://www.uclibc.org/ http://www.uclibc
by calloc 16y ago
Eh wha? No-one has tried to do an alternative glibc? Wrong:
http://www.fefe.de/dietlibc/ http://www.fefe.de/dietlibc/
http://www.uclibc.org/ http://www.uclibc.org/
http://sourceware.org/newlib/ http://sourceware.org/newlib/
- FlorianMueller 16y agoDoes any of those libraries gut the original Linux kernel headers the way Bionic does? Not as far as I can see. You can build libraries if you like, but you can't just put header code under a different license unless you're the original right holder or have the original right holder's consent.
- calloc 16y agoYou said that no-one has tried to do an alternative to glibc. I proved you wrong. I never made any statements on anything else you said, so really I am not sure what you are arguing for or against...