But that article could be about virtually anything. Articles about things that are untrue, where methodology is wrong, can be substituted for anything and prov

But that article could be about virtually anything. Articles about things that are untrue, where methodology is wrong, can be substituted for anything and prove those things are true too (like how you can prove anything mathematically if you start with one incorrect premise). I do agree that we should study how poor science is done. But there's a difference between studying poor science, and actually spending time trying to figure out how one might actually be the next Airbender.