3 ms·
I get the Apollo esthetic (I watched the Skylab missions as a kid on our black & white console TV). But two of the major differences between then and now is che
by chiph 6y ago
I get the Apollo esthetic (I watched the Skylab missions as a kid on our black & white console TV). But two of the major differences between then and now is cheap computing and additive machining. Cheap computing means you don't need a zillion physical switches for everything. So the cabin is less cluttered and the usability is better.[0]
The advent of additive machining means everything doesn't have to be right angles and hard corners.[1] As a result the cabin will be safer because your astronauts are less likely to be hurt if there is an unanticipated thrust. Parts can also be made to fit better and to closer tolerances.
With regard to the suits - they look far better than the orange shuttle flight suits. I think that having the umbilical on the thigh was a good innovation. No idea how comfortable they are, but they're only going to be worn for launch & entry. I expect Doug & Bob have already put their shorts & t-shirts on.
https://airandspace.si.edu/stories/editorial/spacex-dragon-launch-and-entry-suits https://airandspace.si.edu/stories/editorial/spacex-dragon-l...
[0] I'm a tiny bit disappointed that they didn't go for a 2001 design, with Eurostile Bold Extended fonts. https://typesetinthefuture.com/2014/01/31/2001-a-space-odyssey/ https://typesetinthefuture.com/2014/01/31/2001-a-space-odyss...
[1] Which is the same reason why shift levers in cars are being replaced by knobs and switches - so the passengers don't get hurt by them in an accident.