> The government can't declare churches "non-essential" and close them. And indeed, under this current order, they haven't. They've limited them to min(25% ca

> The government can't declare churches "non-essential" and close them. And indeed, under this current order, they haven't. They've limited them to min(25% capacity, 100). What's under contention is whether this is treating churches differently than other similarly-situated secular facilities. The two sides come to a disagreement over which other facilities count as "similarly-situated".