Not a shock. Paraphrasing Scalia who wrote years ago, the context was about the 2nd, but his point was there are no absolute rights. In this case he said that

Not a shock. Paraphrasing Scalia who wrote years ago, the context was about the 2nd, but his point was there are no absolute rights. In this case he said that the 2nd (and clarified he meant all rights) is not a license to carry whatever weapon wherever you want for whatever purpose. That the point of the amendment was contextualized and needs to retain that context. Religious practice doesn’t HAVE to take place in a temple. It’s reasonable enough to say that at home or safe group sizes during pandemic create less of a burden on the religious than the spread of a pandemic does for everyone. I understand that that’s not how it was decided. But it goes to show that they don’t just think in black and white. Kavanaugh is an ignoramus though.