3 ms·
I agree fairly strongly with your sentiments. I wanted to know more about what the pilots think of it. In an article[1] a month ago, Bob said "I don’t think I
by rkagerer 6y ago
I agree fairly strongly with your sentiments. I wanted to know more about what the pilots think of it.
In an article[1] a month ago, Bob said "I don’t think I’m going too far out on a limb to say that the right answer for all flying is not to switch to a touchscreen, necessarily. But for the task that we have and to keep ourselves safe flying close to the ISS, the touchscreen is gonna provide us that capability just fine."
Doug explained "The difference is you’ve got to be very deliberate when you’re putting in input, relative to what you would do with a stick. Because you know, when you’re flying an airplane for example, if I push the stick forward it’s going to go down. I actually have to make a concerted effort to do that with the touchscreen, if that makes sense."
So it sounds like there's more cognitive overhead to use the touch interface for flying. I did think the touchscreen was perfect for the procedure checklists shown extensively in the middle console during today's flight.
In the on-board media event a few minutes ago, he pointed out "One thing that does get lost is there is an extensive button panel down below."
[1] https://techcrunch.com/2020/05/04/this-is-certainly-different-astronauts-on-controlling-the-dragon-spacecraft-via-touchscreen/ https://techcrunch.com/2020/05/04/this-is-certainly-differen...
- vsareto 6y agoI'd be concerned about touch screens where the user input is at the mercy of Chromium and then the OS, which itself is complicated enough. Maybe they have some crazy Chromium + RTOS solution though. I'd be interested if they set up mechanical testing for the touch screens and what their error rate for handling a touch is. A stick while flying is useful for weather, but there's no weather in space. In space, a stick probably provides little feedback.