3 ms·
> Not really open Not many people still consider non-copyleft open source licenses not "open" (even the FSF disagrees on the need for copyleft to be considered
by magicalist 6y ago
> Not really open
Not many people still consider non-copyleft open source licenses not "open" (even the FSF disagrees on the need for copyleft to be considered libre) and MIT, BSD, and Apache 2.0 in particular are widely considered proper open source, so I think you just mean "Not really copyleft", which, sure.