I do not see any statement from Alito, but he voted with the dissent. The position of Roberts (writing for the majority) is that: > Where those broad limits a

I do not see any statement from Alito, but he voted with the dissent. The position of Roberts (writing for the majority) is that: > Where those broad limits are not exceeded, they should not be subject to second-guessing by an “unelected federal judiciary," Which is to say, even the majority acknlowdges that there are times where the courts should intervene. The question of what a "comparable" secular activity is is very much a legal one.