3 ms·

What do you think is the theory you believe that is most outside the mainstream?

arminiusreturns 6y ago
Mainstream of of which community? Some things that seem out there to most people are regularly accepted by the conspiracy community, and vice versa sometimes too. Almost any conspiracy theory of any depth is outside the mainstream. The furthest in both cases would probably have to do with aliens (whether real or fake but useful aka project blue beam). Or perhaps quantum mechanic related phenomenon. Not saying these are ones I subscribe to but giving examples. I'll give you an example of one that is very much not accepted: Pizzagate (please don't misunderstand, I don't necessarily think pizzagate is "real", I think it very much could be a limited-hangout, etc). To many it sounds completely crazy, beyond ever being considered. For those of us who are aware of the larger pattern it matches though, it fits into that pattern. A great example of a similar case in which we have deductive evidence is the Dutroux affair (aka the Belgian X-Files). Epstein was on the periphery of the same type of operation, but was more of a front man/procurer, much like Dutroux. I could list many similar examples (Franklin scandal, finders cult, Saville, Jersey, Kinkora, Elm Guest House, Roy Cohn, etc) where we have witnesses and testimony and evidence that usually got buried, assassinated, etc if it ever got closer to the heart and away from the front men/fall guys (and gals, looking at you Ghislaine Maxwell). This is the power of inductive logic.
- JoeSmithson 6y ago
  Yes sorry, I meant outside the non-conspiracy community. For example (apologies if this is rude to ask, I don't know!) which of these would you subscribe to; - Neil Armstrong did not walk on the moon - JFK was not killed by Lee Harvey Oswald - WTC towers were destroyed in controlled demolition ----------- EDIT: nevermind, you edited your comment - thanks!
  - deleted 6y ago
    [deleted]

Mainstream of of which community? Some things that seem out there to most people are regularly accepted by the conspiracy community, and vice versa sometimes too. Almost any conspiracy theory of any depth is outside the mainstream. The furthest in both cases would probably have to do with aliens (whether real or fake but useful aka project blue beam). Or perhaps quantum mechanic related phenomenon. Not saying these are ones I subscribe to but giving examples. I'll give you an example of one that is very much not accepted: Pizzagate (please don't misunderstand, I don't necessarily think pizzagate is "real", I think it very much could be a limited-hangout, etc). To many it sounds completely crazy, beyond ever being considered. For those of us who are aware of the larger pattern it matches though, it fits into that pattern. A great example of a similar case in which we have deductive evidence is the Dutroux affair (aka the Belgian X-Files). Epstein was on the periphery of the same type of operation, but was more of a front man/procurer, much like Dutroux. I could list many similar examples (Franklin scandal, finders cult, Saville, Jersey, Kinkora, Elm Guest House, Roy Cohn, etc) where we have witnesses and testimony and evidence that usually got buried, assassinated, etc if it ever got closer to the heart and away from the front men/fall guys (and gals, looking at you Ghislaine Maxwell). This is the power of inductive logic.

JoeSmithson 6y ago
Yes sorry, I meant outside the non-conspiracy community. For example (apologies if this is rude to ask, I don't know!) which of these would you subscribe to; - Neil Armstrong did not walk on the moon - JFK was not killed by Lee Harvey Oswald - WTC towers were destroyed in controlled demolition ----------- EDIT: nevermind, you edited your comment - thanks!
- deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]