4 ms·
Maybe you're right. Your tone, and granted this it the Internet where tone is implied by the reader, seemed very presumptuous. I think ultimately the first part
by bluedays 6y ago
Maybe you're right. Your tone, and granted this it the Internet where tone is implied by the reader, seemed very presumptuous. I think ultimately the first part of my post was an, admittedly, biased opinion. So yeah, I am probably wrong about that. Though, I would really like to see some data on this.
However, I am concerned about a disinformation campaign which could, theoretically, be sponsored by a foreign state to get people to ignore the very real threat of coronations.
- sokoloff 6y agoSorry for the tone. I tend towards a little formal perhaps, but it’s intended to be optimized for precision not presumption. I am also concerned about foreign influence, but I also observe that we meddle in other countries’ affairs as well, so it’s just a fact of life and social media changes it but didn’t start it. I’m more concerned with a population who isn’t thinking critically and with the right balance of short and long term (and is therefore especially susceptible to influence), but whether the influence is foreign or domestic doesn’t matter as much to me as the effect of the influence.