This feels somewhat akin to the discussion about whether or not climate change is a hoax. In both cases, the overwhelming majority of experts in each field resp

This feels somewhat akin to the discussion about whether or not climate change is a hoax. In both cases, the overwhelming majority of experts in each field respectively hold a position about each issue. That's where I defer to their judgment. Then, on the other hand, you have conservative papers, economics journals and cable shows implying or stating that those experts are wrong. Having beliefs that align with the consensus of experts isn't "tribalism" nor is it political just because there is a tribal anti-science perspective. That's a false dichotomy.