2 ms·
K-8 is primary school, right? Its value is mostly not in education. If it was it would look very different. Mastery based learning would be the norm, not unknow
by barry-cotter 6y ago
K-8 is primary school, right? Its value is mostly not in education. If it was it would look very different. Mastery based learning would be the norm, not unknown. Spaced repetition would be incorporated everywhere so what was taught was retained. There would be no social advancement.
The school system is enormously wasteful of time. It takes about 40 hours to teach a nine year old to read English and about the same time to cover the primary school Math curriculum with a 12 year old.
If we took Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development seriously we wouldn’t spend so much time teaching children things they’ll pick up tens of times faster in three years. I don’t know what primary school would look like if we cared about children learning but it wouldn’t look much like the current system.
- otoburb 6y agoI am just a parent of two K-8 children so not entirely up to speed on the latest theory and practice of ZPD. But when I first read about this before my first was born I understood ZPD to be "empathetic tutoring" which seems increasingly difficult to execute correctly when student:teacher ratios exceed 4:1, and ideally 1-1 for maximum benefit. ZPD works, but nobody has been able to implement this at-scale, let alone in the K-8 public school system.