3 ms·
I agree with you. So maybe the question we should ask ourselves is: why isn’t there a smaller, cheaper EC2 instance (or any other provider than AWS) ? This in
by JeanMarcS 6y ago
I agree with you.
So maybe the question we should ask ourselves is: why isn’t there a smaller, cheaper EC2 instance (or any other provider than AWS) ?
This industry is tailoring the levels. Of course it’s understandable because, well, they live on it. And they count on small instances to share hardware ressources to overbook said hardware.
And I don’t blame them for that, I’m doing the same on my own bare metal servers, hosting multiple websites for clients and making money on it.
But I have the feeling that there is a lot of ressource loss somewhere in it, just for the sake of loosing it because it’s easier. Maybe I’m wrong.
- pas 6y agoScaleway, Hetzner, OVH, DigitalOcean, etc. AWS LightSail. ... also the t1.micro is small and cheap. Could you give some concrete numbers?
- mark_l_watson 6y agoI only use AWS when consulting customers prefer it. I get a lot of mileage serving a lot of content for several domains on a free Google Cloud Platform f1 micro instance. I also prefer GCP when I need a lot of compute for a short time. Hetzner has always been my choice when I need more compute for a month or two. For saving money for VPSs OVH and DO have also been useful but I don’t use them very often.
- chillfox 6y agoBack when Joyent still operated a public cloud you could get machines with 100mb of ram. The problem as you go cheaper is the cost of ipv4 addresses.