4 ms·
If the author thinks it's okay, and the reviewer thinks it's okay, a robot that can't actually understand code doesn't need a vote.
by erik_seaberg 6y ago
If the author thinks it's okay, and the reviewer thinks it's okay, a robot that can't actually understand code doesn't need a vote.
- SenHeng 6y agoThe reason for the robot is to have an impartial judge where neither author nor reviewer are okay with the opposing judgement. At the end of the day, a human’s judgement cycle is better reserved for something of a higher priority/use.
- erik_seaberg 6y agoBoth parties should be able to cede style arguments graciously. You can't really win the argument by quoting policy, only postpone the argument and burn team goodwill.