3 ms·
To be fair, you listed the requirements to "stop" an infectious disease, but then claimed them not being met meant it wasn't "under control". Those are two diff
by RHSeeger 6y ago
To be fair, you listed the requirements to "stop" an infectious disease, but then claimed them not being met meant it wasn't "under control". Those are two different things. The disease can be "under control" with the caveat that it only remains so as long as we continue to take certain precautions. Once it's "stopped", those precautions aren't really necessary.
- ptero 6y agoAgreed. I assumed a particular interpretation of "under control" which could have been different from what the poster meant.