3 ms·
I don't know, this feels overly vague to me. Sure, some things shouldn't be built with frameworks. However, some things should be. Personally, if the project
by whycombagator 6y ago
I don't know, this feels overly vague to me.
Sure, some things shouldn't be built with frameworks. However, some things should be.
Personally, if the project is large enough/warrants it, give me rails/django/laravel or ember/angular over something frameworkless _most of the time_.
Why? because there is documentation and an established community. With the frameworks I mentioned there is also sometimes conventions (i.e rails/ember).
Can you build something with frameworks that is horrific, madding, and complex? Yes. Can you achieve that same result without a framework? Yes.
IMO the propensity to get things wrong in the context of a framework is less than the propensity to get things wrong without one.
I think this manifesto is missing more thought/detail to properly reason about.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- oorza 6y agoIf you follow the Github rabbit hole down a little bit, the founders link to this document as a justification for their stance: http://matteo.vaccari.name/blog/archives/1019 http://matteo.vaccari.name/blog/archives/1019 Basically, it seems everything they believe is "follow extreme programming as rigidly as possible and it will alleviate the downsides to being as short sighted as possible."