3 ms·
Ask HN: How does Google know police shooting target's name?
A close friend of mine was recently the target of a fatal police shooting (justified), but his name was never released to the press. However, when I search for his name, the news articles talking about his death are at the top. This seems like a real problem.
EDIT: and exact string match doesn't bring up the AMP pages that report on it. There are no strings in the article pages themselves that mention the name.
- Nextgrid 6y agoWhen you do an exact match search by putting the name in quotes, does it bring anything? It should bring up content that contains the name and even highlight it.
- brailsafe 6y agoYes, and these articles don't show up. There are no strings that point directly to his name in the AMP pages that report on it.
- Nextgrid 6y agoIn this case could it be matching against a cached, earlier publication where the name was (accidentally) published before being edited out in the version you are seeing now?
- brailsafe 6y agoI suppose it's possible, but I haven't seen any traces of it yet. I'll look through archive.org, but it's all regional news in Canada.
- kevindeasis 6y agoI'm not sure exactly, but I suspect it goes something like this: An algorithm they are using are finding a match in some category(ies) for you that other people have already searched or it might be an AI trained model. Like there are people you know or close to your network, that searched for the same thing and they clicked the specific link. Now use a curl in a vpn in a different network and you get totally different results.
- brailsafe 6y agoThis was my first thought as well, but it turns out not to be the case. Using curl in a VPN turns out roughly the same results. I suppose it's possible that enough people have found out and sought out the relevant news that the engine is making the association though.
- jereees 6y agoWhat’s the real problem in this case?
- brailsafe 6y agoWhat do you mean? It sort of negates the implicit discretion that one would hope for by redacting the name of someone involved. Seems kind of akin to Facebook revealing the sexual identity of someone who hasn't revealed that to certain people.